Suppose you had a business whose sales had dropped 13% over the past year, continuing a multi-year sales decline. You’d probably look for ways to run your business more efficiently by cutting expenses. You might even consider reducing your prices to attract more business.

Well if you’re the United States Postal Service (USPS), you have a different take on what to do about a double-digit decline in revenue: you decide to raise your rates to make up for lost income, in some cases dramatically.

According to BtoB Magazine, in early-July the USPS requested that standard-mail letter rates, the kind used most often for commercial direct mail campaigns, be increased 5%. The USPS also asked that standard-mail parcel rates, used to send small-size merchandise and product samples, be raised a whopping 23.3%.

Raising prices to make up for decreasing sales? Is that any way to run a business?

Mail volume is dwindling because consumers are increasingly using electronic communications as alternatives to postal deliveries. That’s an undeniable fact. The proof: from 2007 through 2009, the volume of mail handled by the USPS fell by 36 billion pieces, a 17% decline and the greatest drop in its history.

This year, the USPS is on track to lose a stunning $6.5 billion. Yet, instead of doing something to manage expenses, the Affordable Mail Alliance reports that in 2009 the USPS managed to reduce labor costs by a mere single percentage point, 1%.

I have long been a proponent of direct mail, believing it best to give consumers a choice of communications vehicles. We’ve also seen studies showing that most people still prefer snail mail over e-mail, viewing it as a welcome respite from their clogged inboxes. But this latest plea for another price increase begs the question: At what point does it become cost prohibitive to use a communications medium whose delivery costs can run up to 100 times more than that of its electronic competitors?

I hate to say it, but maybe it’s time to consider eliminating mail—and the USPS—from the marketing mix.

What do you think?

Tom Rapsas is a seasoned Creative Director and Direct / Loyalty Marketing guru. He is also a valued contributor to Loyalty Truth. You can follow him on Twitter: @TomRapsas

When I’m working with any of my business partners in the Customer Strategy Network, whether from the UK or New Zealand, I’m used to being treated as a second class citizen.

There is something about the British-influenced accent and manner of speech that simply makes everything they say sound more intelligent than my best shot. At the least, we like to jab each other about this in fun, but the truth is, my foreign counterparts have a knack for getting their message across.

Yesterday as I opened white mail from Office Depot’s Worklife Rewards® and email from Best Buy’s Reward Zone®, I was struggling to put my finger on how the two programs contrasted in their management of member communications. My English friend cleared it up for me in one pithy phrase by saying “people don’t like fiddly things”.

When it comes to maintaining customer engagement with rewards and loyalty programs these days, nothing more telling could be said.

That day, I received a threefold brochure from Worklife Rewards informing me that I had earned a reward for $11 and included a plastic card that I could take to the store and use to redeem against purchase. The brochure provided a mini-statement of my account as well as some partner offers from 1-800 Flowers, Ameriprise Financial, Budget & National Car Rental, and LaQuinta.

The communications piece was easy to read, got to the point, and the delivery of the reward got my attention.

On the same day, I received an email from Reward Zone informing me that my account needed activation. This was strange to me as I have had an account with Best Buy since the program opened over 5 years ago. The next day I received an email from Best Buy offering me their cobrand credit card, but referencing a different reward account number. Strange as well.

I’ll save you the details by saying that a duplicate account had been created through one of my purchases and only after multiple attempts to login to both accounts and a phone call to the customer service center was I able to resolve the matter.

The good news is the matter was resolved. The bad news is that I don’t think many people would have taken the time and exercised my patience to endure the process. I’m a Loyalty Geek and had I not been looking into this for business reasons, would have disconnected with Reward Zone and given the program no further attention or energy.

Loyalty program sponsors and operators need to constantly seek out the “fiddly things” in the member experience and seek to streamline and simplify that experience with the objective of keeping consumers in love with their brand and their rewards program. Best Buy had a few too many Loyalty Asterisks in the process for my taste and I’m sure these Fiddly Things would have driven the average customer mad, causing them, in English parlance, to “bugger off”.

Don’t let that happen to your brand.

Passion. It’s what fuels the average person like you and I to enter and train for a local 10K race or even a sprint triathlon.

Passion. It’s what every event sponsor at these races is hoping to stoke up by their presence at the events.

Participating in the Open Water Swim festival this weekend in Ft. Myers, I had another chance to see how well brands were connecting with their most passionate audience. While it sometime seems that everyone and her brother has participated in a triathlon, the reality is that less than 1/3 of 1% of the US population has toed the starting line.

As the Ft. Myers News-Press.com reminded readers over the weekend, “open water is not for the meek”, underscoring that participation in these events is even more selective.

Skinny audience aside, the demographic for participant sports such as triathlon is appealing to brands, and makers of apparel, accessories, and nutritional supplements for this crowd have found event based marketing to be a successful way to build brand awareness, create customer engagement, and set the foundation for longer term customer loyalty.

Hammer Nutrition, ClifBar, and Gu Energy Gel have all successfully incorporated event based marketing as a means to build their business, and one of the highlights of the Ft. Myers swim for me this weekend was connecting with the event team from Muscle Milk to understand their approach.

Made by Cyto Sport, Muscle Milk is a lactose-free, well balanced protein formula that can be used for post-workout recovery or as a meal replacement. The on-site team was friendly, attractive, and fulfilled the athletic image of the people the product was designed to serve. The marketing method of the day was simple – be friendly and give away product samples to participating athletes.

Kudos to Muscle Milk for getting out of the gym and tapping into a huge potential market of multi-sport events. But the simplicity of execution whetted my appetite with a host of possibilities to enhance their presence and create marketing ROI through Muscle Milk’s appearance at the race.

For instance, a simple contest or drawing would have been the path to collecting lots of email addresses and a short survey (what’s your favorite flavor, tell us what races you want to see us at this summer) would create a shortcut to understanding customer preferences.

I also have to think that someone (on or off site) could have been tweeting about the event in the week before and on race day, maybe weaving in a promotion or coupon for followers who joined the conversation.

With many races under budget pressure, sponsorship of the finishing medals would have been an inexpensive way to further stamp the Muscle Milk brand in participant minds. Don’t forget that those finishing medals are displayed with pride for a while at home, generating multiple brand impressions.

I don’t want to give it all away, but consumer packaged goods marketers (CPG) like Muscle Milk could create a virtual location in Foursquare and create a promotion for those that check-in most often throughout the summer’s events. I could also imagine a special Groupon being created or a way for Muscle Milk to participate in the Zavee fun to build customer data and create sales.

Like Tom Cruise once said, multi-sport is a “target rich environment” and everything I’ve outlined here could be easily executed by Muscle Milk at relatively low cost and with measurable return on marketing investment.

Sounds like a podium sweep to me.

Oracle is increasingly active in the Loyalty Marketing industry and has reported success in providing technology support for some of the largest frequent flyer programs in the US.

I recently ran across an Oracle blog that recounted how Alaska Airlines upped its email game, adding a greater degree of personalization by replacing a legacy mainframe loyalty system with Siebel Loyalty and Siebel Marketing. Going beyond the sales driven copy in the post, I was interested to hear Steve Jarvis, Vice President Market Sales & Customer Experience – Alaska Airlines speak about the airline’s commitment to provide “proactive customer service” and “superior customer service and innovations” to the over 22 Million passengers they fly annually.

Apparently, Alaska could only reach the 2 Million flyers enrolled in its frequent flyer program and was suffering from the same problem encountered by many retailers – how to identify the customer and create customer engagement. The Siebel installation apparently changed all that as Steve Jarvis relates in this video.

Alaska’s new-found ability to reach its customer base with targeted emails and promotions made me think – which pattern will they follow? Will it be a judicious email policy adopted by the legacy airlines or the firehose approach adopted by the newer “discount” airlines, in particular Spirit?

Hanifin Loyalty recently completed a survey of the use of email as a communications vehicle across the loyalty programs of 22 companies in the Airline, Retail, and Hospitality industries. Full results of the survey will be published in the very near future.

As a preview of the findings, the airlines had the highest rate of email issuance at 5.4 per month. 35% of the emails were related to program membership (meaning statements and newsletters) while 56% were purely promotional and 6.75% were pitching cobrand credit cards.

Sadly, less than 1% of all emails had evidence of a behavioral trigger (i.e. the customer did something that triggered a promotion or offer) and surveys were rare indeed.

The biggest contrast stood out between legacy and discount air carriers with legacy (American, Delta, US Airways) issuing 3.5 emails per month & discount carriers 7.3 per month. Spirit stood out among all airlines surveyed with a whopping 14.8 emails per month.

The results of our email survey pointed out the importance of cadence and relevancy in managing email campaigns. Spirit certainly displays a consistent cadence with an email almost every other day. Trouble is, how many “Red Light Specials” can the recipient endure before she reaches for the delete button every time Spirit shows in the Send field?

For loyalty program sponsors, in this case airlines, two huge areas of opportunity exist.

1. Use the data they possess to send fewer emails with higher relevancy. This is the antidote for customer attrition.
2. Make it bleeding obvious (as my UK friends would say) that something the customer did triggered the email.

I want to know that because I visited the Delta Crown Room in LaGuardia that I later received a discounted offer for annual membership. Better yet, I’d like to see that my survey response indicating St. Croix as a favorite destination with American Airlines resulted in a packaged offer of hotel and discounted airfare.

These days, it’s just about impossible to find a social media “expert” who doesn’t recommend that your company and/or clients jump on the social media bandwagon. And why not? It really is an amazing new channel that both empowers customers and, as pointed out by Bill Hanifin, is about as close to the holy grail of 1-to-1 communications as we ever may get.

But let me play devil’s advocate for a moment: Is there ever a situation where getting into social media is a mistake? Well, just maybe. There are at least a few companies on the social media scene that are taking a thumping.

I’m talking about companies that, justly or unjustly, are seen as having a less than sterling reputation when it comes to customer service. With the advent of social media, these companies have to deal with more than angry customers on the phone—they now have angry customers on the Net, with the ability to amplify their message to thousands of others, often on the company’s own social networking sites.

One vertical that seems to have more than its fair share of angry Netizens are the cable companies. Take for instance, Comcast. In a past post, I wrote about some Comcast service-related issues I was having with the cable conglomerate, but also pointed out that their Twitter presence was top-notch.

As far as I can tell, Comcast has no official Facebook presence but, as you might expect, others have filled the void. A quick look reveals two separate Facebook pages for people who don’t like the company, including “I Hate Comcast”. Yet the fact that Comcast doesn’t have its own corporate Facebook page may be a good move—especially when you take a look at competitor Verizon, who is being forced to fight off critics right on its home turf.

On Verizon’s Facebook Discussion page are threads that include “Verizon sucks” and “Awful Customer Service”. More vitriol can be found on the company’s “Fans of FiOS” page. Along with accolades, there is a steady stream of negative postings like: “Verizon has the worst customer service in the world and here are all the things I now HATE about FiOS”, followed by a 10-point list.

What’s most interesting are the responses from the “Fans of FiOS crew” (aka Verizon employees) who have the unenviable job of answering these rants. In most cases, they respond in a bright and chirpy manner that deals with the issue at hand and ignores the nastiness. But many times the FiOS crew appears to let damaging claims go unchallenged.

Here are two customer postings that did not get an official company response:

“Beware. Their billing is atrocious. Watch your bills closely, they are playing games with the bills.”

and:

“Verizon lies again with their offers and promotion propaganda and I am not the only one. Many people on this board are not getting the $150.00 gift card that you promised when we signed up as new costumers. Explain please!!”

The query below received some polite technical advice regarding the Xbox issue, but ignored the “bill” and ”dedicated line” comments:

“This service blows I’ve been getting so much lag on xbox live…my bill is crazy high every month going up and I’m still in my one year contract…and by the way its not fiber to the home… its a shared network too… stop advertising “dedicated line” until u back it up.”

Ouch! So what do you do if you’re Verizon, now that the social media genie is out of the bottle, and you’re consistently being hammered on your own Facebook page? Well, the “Fans of FiOS Team on Facebook” recently took action. They put up a “Notice Regarding Repeat Posts on the Wall” which in part reads:

To our valued Fans,

Recently, we’ve seen a number of fans repeatedly posting questions regarding content that we’ve addressed in the past…these repetitious posts have made it more difficult to address new questions…for this reason, we have decided to begin removing repeat posts of the same topic.

So they’ve given themselves the “right to remove posts”—which could mean taking down any complaint on any issue they feel like they’ve already addressed. This is sure to tick off some fans of FiOS, who see the Facebook page as a public square—but I think Verizon has done the right thing.

At a certain point, you just can’t let your own Web pages be a platform that assists in your own demise and further damages you’re already less than golden reputation.

What do you think?

Online retailers have a uniquely difficult challenge in building relationships and creating customer loyalty. Without a store-front to rely upon, most online retailers lead with product selection and price to attract first time buyers.

This leaves many to rely on ad words and keyword search as their only acquisition funnel. Generating repeat business, building trusted relationships, and retaining valuable customers? Those three goals can become esoteric concepts to the marketing department as they  continually focus resources on acquisition for fear of muffling the principal sales driver that works.

The first wave of internet business placed the hurdle for marketing very low. Building traffic and gathering eyeballs was all that mattered and it seemed that selling this portfolio of traffic was more the goal than creating a business model on fundamental business principles.

Web 2.0 is different. The online stores that are working operate like a traditional retailer in the sense that they have to provide product choice, quality, and good service as a minimum to succeed. The business models adopted are generally sound and the achilles heel for those single channel, pure online, retailers remains price. Price as in LOW price.

Hammer Nutrition is one pure online retailer that caught my eye. The company caters to a well defined passionate customer group, endurance athletes. But they are not allowed the privilege to compete in a vacuum as many of their supplement and fueling products (electrolyte drinks, energy bars, joint formulas) are sold by larger, heavily branded, and more widely marketed companies from GNC to Power Bar (owned by Nestle) and Clif Bar (distributed through major grocery chains, Costco, and specialty shops).

How does Hammer Nutrition compete? It stays true to the values of its founder, Brian Frank. Brian grew up in California in a progressively-minded household and caught the action sport bug early on, riding bikes, skateboards, swimming, and racing BMX and motocross bikes to the point where he won Montana State Motocross Championships in the late 90’s. Frustrated by the sparsity of quality, naturally formulated products to meet the needs of endurance athletes, he founded Hammer Nutrition during the 80’s.

His mantra from those days has survived the passage of time:  Deliver naturally formulated quality products and cement customers for life with product knowledge and trust.

A little guerrilla marketing was at the core of the Hammer strategy: provide “Race Bags” at events around the country as a cost effective way to meet the core audience for Hammer products at their moment of highest interest. If you’ve participated in any organized athletic event from a local 5K walk to an Ironman, one of the “bennies” received for your entry fee is the race day bag. The bag itself carries branding on the outside and is kind of like the athlete’s version of an Easter basket – lots of product samples and surprises inside. When I spoke with Brian a few months ago, he told me that the program now distributes over 750,000 bags across 2,200 events in North America. That’s some powerful grass roots marketing – Word of Mouth advertising at its best before the term was coined.

The impressive part of the marketing strategy at Hammer Nutrition is its constant flow of educational and product information materials, part of an overall communication stream designed to build engagement and increase customer retention. A first order will usually trigger sending of the “Little Red Book” (product descriptions and usage instructions) and a “Welcome to the Family” letter signed by Brian Frank or one of his guru partners Steve Born or Dr. William Misner.

Triggered by an array of qualifying metrics, new customers receive monthly product-focused brochures, quarterly Endurance News magazines with articles highlighting athletes of all types who have competed successfully using Hammer products, and reminder post cards with previous orders outlined to facilitate easy reorder. Invitation to join the Autoship program is packed with benefits and discounts and the Referral program has a dual benefit feature where both existing and new customer earn a discount.

An open call to any athlete to use Hammer products is made via the HammerBuck$ program which challenges customers to “Turn race day into Payday”. Over $36,000 in cash and credit was awarded to 36 winners during 2009. The program is simple, race in Hammer gear, place highly in your race, and win some cash or credits for future purchase. Talk about crowdsourcing, just think about motivating gobs of your best customers who fit your ideal profile to wear your logo on race day and give it their all to stand on the podium at the end of the day!

Granted that I may have lost some of you who hate to run, or for whom the idea of an open water swim, adventure race or ultra-marathon is greeted with a wry smile while muttering “they’re nuts!”

Look past the issue of endurance sports and you will see a sophisticated, if not home grown, communication stream that delivers on the company’s brand promise while driving business goals. There are lots of good lessons for any pure online retailer to take away from a visit to the Hammer Nutrition web site.

A small firestorm over the efficacy of Loyalty Marketing programs broke out over this past weekend thanks in large part to an article written by Joanne Kaufman for the Wall Street Journal.

Ms. Kaufman recounts a telling tale of how her own household purchase behavior adapted to take advantage of rewards programs from Duane Reade to Starbucks to the local pizzeria and shoe store, only to be thoroughly disillusioned by an in-store experience at Duane Reade.

It seems that her son was shopping at the store and had his rewards card rejected with a less than satisfactory explanation from the cashier that Duane Reade was in a “blackout” period prior to launching a new and improved customer loyalty program. According to Ms. Kaufman, worse than the blackout message was the discovery that points previously earned in Duane Reade’s Dollar Rewards™ program would not be honored in the new program.

There are several lessons to be learned here and a few questions raised as well.

First, some background: On Jan. 15, Duane Reade announced it was launching FlexRewards™, a replacement program to Dollar Rewards™, the Company’s previous customer rewards program. The new program was to be in effect on Jan. 16. On Feb. 17, Walgreens announced that it was acquiring Duane Reade, the largest drug store chain in New York City.

The Questions:

1. What influenced the timing of Duane Reade’s launch of a new program when they were (presumably) deep into the final negotiations of the sale?
2. Regardless of the answer to #1, how could someone within Duane Reade, a company recently complimented for its customer facing marketing efforts, have been lulled into allowing the “your old points don’t count” feature to come into play? Have a look at the message on the graphic here “The old card works (just not in our store). I clicked everywhere I could on the program website and could not find an explanation for this disconcerting message.
3. Could Duane Reade have found a better way to communicate the program transition to its members? Why, oh why, does business place the burden of communications on cashiers at the point of sale? It’s an unfair burden on the position with highest turnover in the store and one that does not serve the corporation well.
4. Walgreens has a lightly advertised rewards program “Walgreens Rewards“. Will they do away with this program or will they launch something that allows consumers to earn and accumulate points at any Walgreens-owned property?

Some answers are easier to guess at than others.

The announcement by Walgreens regarding Duane Reade mentioned specifically that it would allow the chain to continue to operate under its own name. That said, launching an upgraded program might have seemed business as usual to Duane Reade marketers. Needless to say, there needs to be some damage control from Duane Reade as an operational faux pas of this nature intensifies consumer ire towards consumer rewards programs.

The most interesting question to speculate about has to do with the future of the Walgreens customer strategy.

The current program “Walgreens Rewards” offers rewards on specified products purchased using a Walgreens Card®. The value proposition does not seem clear or particularly strong and there are many product restrictions which limit earning power for members. One strong program feature is the ability to pass the Walgreens Card at the point-of-sale and instantly be credited for rewards.

As far the new Duane Reade program itself, it seems that the earning power from its predecessor has been reduced. The current offer is for customers to spend $250 to receive a $5 cash back offer. This equates to a 2% earn rate, less than the 5% offered by the previous plan according to the WSJ.

FlexRewards™ offers members lower prices on many items and rewards that can be spent on the spot at point-of-sale or can be saved up for larger rewards. Clumsy paper coupons which could be easily lost by consumers have been traded in for electronic points tracking online. Points issued never expire provided a purchase is made every 26 weeks, a generous definition of an “active” customer in the pharmacy space to be sure.

According to Joe Jackman, Acting Chief Marketing Officer, Duane Reade “customers had spoken and wanted more easily attainable rewards”, adding “half of customers in our old program didn’t even redeem their reward coupons because there were too many restrictions”.

It certainly seems that the strategy cooked up by Duane Reade is headed in the right direction and had increased customer engagement as a key objective. The company even introduced a new “Super Saver” tier to reward higher spending customers at a faster pace and with more flexible rewards.

Contrast the two programs at Walgreens and Duane Reade and you should not be surprised to see either the Duane Reade program extended (in structure if not by name) to include Walgreens stores or some new program from Walgreens that would at least improve upon the current offer. The more inclusive, the better as customers will respond well to a program that allows points accumulation at both Duane Reade and Walgreens stores.

Lessons:

1. Execution nearly trumps strategy these days.  My old boss, Pat LaPointe, coined the phrase “Technology enables, but imagination wins”. Based on what clients are telling me today, I have modified the mantra this way: “Technology enables, imagination wins, but flawless execution will save your job!”.

2. Expectations for Customer Communication are higher than ever. Consumers have access to more information than ever and expect clear, transparent messaging. Anything less sets you up for what Ms. Kaufman called “Loyalty Betrayal”.

3. Staff training and incentives will trigger better program results. Turnover at the point-of-sale is difficult to control but an effort can be made to provide front line personnel with sales aids, inexpensive “take-me’s” and similar POS material to make the job easier for overburdened staff. Offering incentives for those that learn and deliver the message would help also.

Just a few months ago, on these very Loyalty Truth pages, I gave kudos to Caesars Atlantic City and its Total Rewards loyalty program.

During some trying times for the economy in general, and Atlantic City in particular, Caesars AC was making some smart moves to get its loyalty program members back to the casino.

Last week, Caesars AC got my attention again. But not in a good way. You see, they ran a rather bizarre full-page ad in the Sunday NYTimes magazine.

Let’s start with the image in the ad: a well-dressed 30-something guy has a pretty woman to his right. She has one hand on his shoulder and another wrapped tightly around his arm. It looks like they’re at a show. Okay so far, except our guy seems more interested in another woman to his left. He has his lips to her ear and her extended arm appears to be resting on his thigh.

Under the headline “The Life You Were Meant to Live“, the stilted copy reads:

Who is that in Section A, Row 1, Seat 5, having the time of your life? That’s Todd. Flanked by your fiery vixens. Paying no attention to your favorite band on stage. But give credit where it’s due. Todd is an escape artist. And when it’s time for a getaway, he get it’s right.

What!?!

Putting aside the confusing use of the possessive “your”, who are the fiery vixens with Todd? Am I supposed to pretend I’m Todd…on some kind of a three-way tryst? Is this what they mean by “he gets it right?” More importantly, did Caesars’ market research show the ménage a trois market to be a growing demographic?

Personally, I can only think of one word for the ad – Stupid.

Instead of creating a scenario that the largely upscale readership of the NYTimes magazine might be able to imagine themselves in, they’ve come up with a fictional character in a contrived situation that’s a non-starter for anyone not in the “swinger” category.

It of course begs the question, what were they thinking? The only thing I can come up with is that Caesars AC is trying to out Vegas-Vegas.

Sorry Caesars, as much as I like you and your loyalty program, you’re no Vegas. And there are better ways to spend your precious marketing dollars.

Tom Rapsas is a 20 year direct and loyalty marketing veteran and heads up Creative Services at Hanifin Loyalty.  He can be reached on Twitter @tomrapsas

Trendy business buzzwords aren’t any fun until you form an opinion and seek feedback to get to the substance of the issue.

Customer Engagement is one of those terms that is being mentioned more frequently than Kim Kardashian was during the Super Bowl. It’s the 2010 version of “what’s hot, what’s new, what’s next?”

The question is, should Customer Engagement be treated as a new marketing sub-set, on par with Loyalty and Word of Mouth Marketing, or is it a concept that’s been around for quite some time and just happens to be a point of pain in the Relationship Value Chain (RVP) for marketers today?

Relationship Value Chain? That’s the term that my good friend and former Colloquy colleague, Kelly Hlavinka, coined almost 10 years ago. The experience of many at the once proud Frequency Marketing was that customer value increased across a spectrum of customer interaction. Link the points of interaction and you had a value chain that loyalty marketers could use to influence communication plans and allocate marketing budget dollars to encourage specific behaviors.

The RVP is similar to the “acquisition – activation – usage – retention” lifecycle marketing that credit card issuers have been using for years, but takes objectives down to a more granular level.

One example of a flow that constitutes a RVP:

• Awareness
• Response to Invitation
• Program Enrollment
• First purchase
• Multiple purchases in response to offers
• Redemption for Reward
• Response to Survey
• Response to Future Bonus
• Multiple Redemptions

No one has a lock on defining the steps in the chain as they should be customized to the business situation under review. Going to back to Customer Engagement, just where does it live in the value chain used as an example here?

Let’s look at a few steps in the RVP and see where, if accused of being “Engaged”, there would be enough evidence to gain a conviction!

Program Enrollment – Doesn’t everyone enroll in programs without much care for future interactions? I enroll in just about every program where I know the odds are that I’ll be back (by choice or force) and the offer looks worthy enough to give it a whirl. The only caveat is that I won’t sign up if the data collection hurdle is too high at the outset.

First Purchase – You’ve got my attention, but what makes you think I’m “Engaged”? I may be a cherry-picking consumer or have just satisfied a one-time need for your product or service. Not enough evidence to convict me as engaged at this point in time.

First Redemption – I’ve stayed around long enough to make multiple purchases over time – how else would I have qualified to redeem? But did you catch me in a cycle of life that won’t soon be repeated, or can you count on me to do it again? Engagement? We’re getting closer, some say “yes”.

Survey Response – I’ve transacted, collected, redeemed, and now I am willing to actually have a conversation. You’ve got my attention, but I am skeptical of what you will do with the information and if I will hear from you again. Does this sound akin to dating? Conversation is certainly an accelerator to engagement, but does not constitute the end goal itself.

Multiple Redemptions – Once I’ve completed the purchase/collection/redemption cycle more than once, I think you can count me as “Engaged”. The focus shifts now to retaining my interest, expanding the conversation, and developing more business as a result.

My take on Customer Engagement is that it describes an end objective that marketers hope to achieve through smart execution of a well designed data-driven Customer Strategy. If you try to define engagement as one of the individual steps, take Enrollment as an example, then what you are truly talking about is more tactical ala “how to create awareness for a program and convert interest to enrollment”.

It’s a step along the way, not engagement itself.

The Loyalty Truth on Customer Engagement is that it has been around for quite a while. The reason the topic has been deserving of the spotlight lately is that customers are increasing difficult to engage, not to mention retain.

What’s your take?

In the past week, business has taken me to Vancouver, BC and San Jose, Costa Rica with a pit stop in South Florida for a day or so at home. None of that was a big deal until my colleague Mike Atkin noted at dinner that we’ve been hitting these spots in conjunction with some pretty big events.

We arrived in Vancouver exactly one week before the start of the 2010 Winter Olympics, landed in South Florida the day before Super Bowl XLIV, and arrived in San Jose on election day as the country was electing the first female President in its history. I’m not sure how I can top that although I have noticed that I arrive back in SoFla just in time to make Valentine’s day special for my wife. Better pull that one off!

I’ve also been using Foursquare for a while and, like a lot of social media waves, I engaged knowing that it would cost me a little time without being sure of a return. I’ve been having some fun with it around my local haunts and have been thinking about how something like Foursquare could intersect with location based offers as part of a loyalty marketing program. My first eye-opener was the blending of Foursquare and Twitter into the Tasti D-Lite rewards program which I talked about in a recent post.

This last jaunt across the continent and back connected a few dots. Checking in to my hotel in Vancouver, I saw a pop-up on my iPhone that said “Special Nearby”. Clicking through, I read “Welcome to the Mill Marine Bistro & Bar. Mayor receives a free beer. Show your server to redeem.”

I wasn’t the Mayor and didn’t get a free beer, but Mike and I did visit the nearby pub to have a quick dinner. The point made was that promotions relevant to someone’s stay could be delivered via this little iPhone application. Better yet, these offers are made to people who have opted-in to receive the offer. in this case, the Mayor might game the offer to get lots of free beer and over time I hope the restaurant will become more creative in the offers made, possibly targeting guests at the hotel next door.

Landing in FLL a day or so later, I switched on the phone and “checked in” to Fort Lauderdale – Hollywood International Airport and received a tip from a local attorney, Leland Garvin. On the verge of the Super Bowl weekend in SoFla, what better message could an attorney send than (paraphrased) “Have fun while in town, but if anything happens from arrest to a speeding ticket, call Leland Garvin, attorney at law.” A phone number was included and if I was a “Who Dat” ready to tear it up for the Super weekend, I would have written it down and tucked it somewhere safe.

With lots of minds grinding on how to incorporate mobile marketing, location based promotions, and social media into loyalty program communication streams, these two “pops” from Foursquare got my attention and sparked some good ideas.

Consider the possibilities. What’s it make you think about?