<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Loyalty Truth Blog &#187; Tiger Woods scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/tag/tiger-woods-scandal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com</link>
	<description>Unbiased insights on Customer Strategy &#38; Loyalty Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tiger Woods &amp; Accenture &#8211; A Celebrity Endorsement Gone Bad</title>
		<link>http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomRapsas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accenture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatorade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/?p=2008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
For me, the most compelling question to arise from the tawdry Tiger Woods scandal isn’t whether his wife will leave him, but whether his corporate sponsors will.  In particular, the management consulting company Accenture.
We’re not talking energy drinks or golf shoes here, Accenture is a starched white collar Fortune Global 500 firm that, excuse the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=53e39edc808829045e8662116d5d05bf&amp;default=http://use.perl.org/images/pix.gif' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.hanifinloyalty.com%2F2009%2F12%2F09%2Ftiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad.html"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.hanifinloyalty.com%2F2009%2F12%2F09%2Ftiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad.html&amp;source=billhanifin&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>For me, the most compelling question to arise from the tawdry Tiger Woods scandal isn’t whether his wife will leave him, but <strong>whether his corporate sponsors will</strong>.  In particular, the management consulting company Accenture.</p>
<p>We’re not talking energy drinks or golf shoes here, Accenture is a starched white collar Fortune Global 500 firm that, excuse the analogy, is <strong>figuratively in bed with Tiger</strong>.</p>
<p>In the words of Accenture’s own Web site:  <em>&#8220;Since 2003, Tiger Woods has been the centerpiece of Accenture advertising and representative of its brand image. As perhaps the world&#8217;s ultimate symbol of high performance, he serves as a metaphor for our commitment to helping companies become high-performance businesses.&#8221; </em> A metaphor for your commitment to helping companies? Well Accenture, I’m thinking that right now <strong>Tiger Woods is not exactly the paragon of commitment</strong>.</p>
<p>Yet, a visit to <strong><a href="http://www.accenture.com/" target="_blank">accenture.com</a></strong> a full week after the scandal broke revealed he is still gracing the company’s home page. The headline, over a big color image of Woods apparently looking for a misplayed shot, reads: &#8220;Opportunity isn&#8217;t always obvious.&#8221; Which, like virtually any headline used with Tiger these days, can be followed up by a punchline. (Sure, opportunity isn’t always obvious. Sometimes you have to go to the <strong>back room of a Vegas lounge</strong> to find it!)</p>
<p>Naughty behavior is always a danger when using a celebrity as your spokesperson. But the fact is, when using a celebrity, even one as previously squeaky clean as Woods, you’ve got to be prepared for a worst-case scenario.</p>
<p>In this case, I think it would have been smart for Accenture to put Tiger on the shelf for at least a few weeks or months until the scandal blew over.  Accenture’s TV commercials used to end with the line “<strong>Just another day in the life of a Tiger</strong>”.  And if that becomes the perception of the company’s attitude toward the Wood’s scandal — that they’ve chosen to ignore the negative implications of being tied to the Tiger — Accenture is going to turn off more than a few current and potential clients.</p>
<p><em><strong>Editor&#8217;s note:</strong></em> As this post was being finalized, <strong>Gatorade</strong> announced that it was <strong><em><a href="http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/12/08/gatorade-terminates-partnership-with-tiger-woods/" target="_blank">discontinuing its Tiger Woods sports drink</a></em></strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Tom Rapsas</strong> is 20-year direct and loyalty marketing veteran and heads up <strong>Creative Services at Hanifin Loyalty</strong>. He can be reached on Twitter <strong><em><a href="http://twitter.com/tomrapsas" target="_blank">@tomrapsas</a></em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiger Woods &amp; Accenture &#8211; A Celebrity Endorsement Gone Bad</title>
		<link>http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TomRapsas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accenture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatorade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/?p=2008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
For me, the most compelling question to arise from the tawdry Tiger Woods scandal isn’t whether his wife will leave him, but whether his corporate sponsors will.  In particular, the management consulting company Accenture.
We’re not talking energy drinks or golf shoes here, Accenture is a starched white collar Fortune Global 500 firm that, excuse the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=53e39edc808829045e8662116d5d05bf&amp;default=http://use.perl.org/images/pix.gif' alt='No Gravatar' width=40 height=40/><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.hanifinloyalty.com%2F2009%2F12%2F09%2Ftiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad-2.html"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.hanifinloyalty.com%2F2009%2F12%2F09%2Ftiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad-2.html&amp;source=billhanifin&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>For me, the most compelling question to arise from the tawdry Tiger Woods scandal isn’t whether his wife will leave him, but <strong>whether his corporate sponsors will</strong>.  In particular, the management consulting company Accenture.</p>
<p>We’re not talking energy drinks or golf shoes here, Accenture is a starched white collar Fortune Global 500 firm that, excuse the analogy, is <strong>figuratively in bed with Tiger</strong>.</p>
<p>In the words of Accenture’s own Web site:  <em>&#8220;Since 2003, Tiger Woods has been the centerpiece of Accenture advertising and representative of its brand image. As perhaps the world&#8217;s ultimate symbol of high performance, he serves as a metaphor for our commitment to helping companies become high-performance businesses.&#8221; </em> A metaphor for your commitment to helping companies? Well Accenture, I’m thinking that right now <strong>Tiger Woods is not exactly the paragon of commitment</strong>.</p>
<p>Yet, a visit to <strong><a href="http://www.accenture.com/" target="_blank">accenture.com</a></strong> a full week after the scandal broke revealed he is still gracing the company’s home page. The headline, over a big color image of Woods apparently looking for a misplayed shot, reads: &#8220;Opportunity isn&#8217;t always obvious.&#8221; Which, like virtually any headline used with Tiger these days, can be followed up by a punchline. (Sure, opportunity isn’t always obvious. Sometimes you have to go to the <strong>back room of a Vegas lounge</strong> to find it!)</p>
<p>Naughty behavior is always a danger when using a celebrity as your spokesperson. But the fact is, when using a celebrity, even one as previously squeaky clean as Woods, you’ve got to be prepared for a worst-case scenario.</p>
<p>In this case, I think it would have been smart for Accenture to put Tiger on the shelf for at least a few weeks or months until the scandal blew over.  Accenture’s TV commercials used to end with the line “<strong>Just another day in the life of a Tiger</strong>”.  And if that becomes the perception of the company’s attitude toward the Wood’s scandal — that they’ve chosen to ignore the negative implications of being tied to the Tiger — Accenture is going to turn off more than a few current and potential clients.</p>
<p><em><strong>Editor&#8217;s note:</strong></em> As this post was being finalized, <strong>Gatorade</strong> announced that it was <strong><em><a href="http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/12/08/gatorade-terminates-partnership-with-tiger-woods/" target="_blank">discontinuing its Tiger Woods sports drink</a></em></strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Tom Rapsas</strong> is 20-year direct and loyalty marketing veteran and heads up <strong>Creative Services at Hanifin Loyalty</strong>. He can be reached on Twitter <strong><em><a href="http://twitter.com/tomrapsas" target="_blank">@tomrapsas</a></em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.hanifinloyalty.com/2009/12/09/tiger-woods-accenture-a-celebrity-endorsement-gone-bad-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

